VISIBLE RIVERS AND INVISIBLE GENDER IN SOUTH ASIA
As a child, I grew up listening to the folklore narrated by my grandparents that talked about the love between two rivers, Teesta (Rongkyu) and Rangeet in the hills of Darjeeling and Sikkim. The story which has survived generations, told the history of rivers who were in love with each other but decided to hide their affection and take separate routes through Mayal Lyang (Dzonghu, Sikkim), promising to meet with each other near a place called Pozok. The rivers were gendered according to their flow by the indigenous people, the river Rangeet was considered a male, because it took a relatively straight course to their meeting place as he was guided by an eagle, while Teesta represented the female gender, as she was guided by a snake and therefore took a meandering route. The place near Kalimpong where the two rivers meet is still called as ‘Lover’s point’.
I recount this story, as a tribute to the fact that various rivers throughout India have been gendered by the people living near them, with a disproportionately large number of rivers being celebrated as female. The gender dynamics are however reversed when we look at the people involved in water governance, conservation and management which is traditionally dominated by men. Various studies throughout India have found that the interaction of women with rivers is comparatively higher than men with a large number of women involved in work that conventionally require utilization of water resources.
An interesting intersection between gender and river is seen for communities living in and around Brahmaputra as it flows from Bhutan to Bangladesh, a study which looked at these gender and social variation, found that in the valleys and downstream reaches (i.e. Assam and Bangladesh) due to better land quality, male participation in the workforce increased, leading to their control over the local economy, which ultimately resulted in decreased working capacity of female, therefore invisibilising their existence outside their homes. This prompted the shaping of male centric societies, estranging women from social, economic and political control. However in the slopes or the upstream reaches (I.e. Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh), where land is relatively less fertile the male members of the family would in general move somewhere else for work, and female members of household enjoyed increased participation in the workforce. This had made them more noticeable in work spaces, which has led to a wider scope for female participation in the society at a large and thereby creating a relatively equal society, with equal property status for women. This shows that the role played by the river in creation of gender based social order cannot be denied.
Globally, only around 7% of the leaders who make decisions pertaining to rivers and water bodies are female. This underrepresentation has resulted in a lack of women voices during creation of policies which have been driven by profit making incentives rather than water conservation. It is therefore high time to turn things around and improve women’s participation in decision making.
Name: Abhinaw Sharma
Email ID: M2019PHSE001@tiss.edu